Holocaust Dissertation Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Holocaust - Dissertation Example (Langer, 1975) Being moved from one language to another, particularly from German into English, then into French, is bound to change some of the meanings as well as lose some of them. Language is such an ambiguous concept that denotations are simply never sufficient in translating the exact intended meaning of the author. Authors utilize connotations of words in the language as they know it, however, the implied meaning may be lost to the translator. It is a fact that in research, there is only an average of approximately 80 percent of success in the translation of the meaning the original written works. Though the exact percentage of accuracy of the â€Å"Night† is not provided, there were some things that the author did not intend in the English version of the book. Rodway's use of words were a little too strong and graphic, bordering on crude, with her description of certain sensitive scenes in the book. The original work written by Elie used a little bit of Hebrew and Germ an, wherein some of the definitions would have most probably been lost along the process of translation. There are implied meanings in a language that could be overlooked by a translator no matter how fluent or efficient they are. Records state that Elie have in fact used some Hebrew characters originating from ancient customs which necessitates even more expertise in translating his texts in order to perceive his true meaning. Throughout the book, particularly the English translation, there were some implications of objections to Christianity as a religion, as well as similar objections to Judaism. The main title of the book, â€Å"Night†, was made in reference to how Elie's family, and other Jews alike, used to pray to God to get the night over with a lot faster. The author wrote his frustrations and his inability to contemplate how a loving God can allow tragedies as such can happen. This version of the book has brought on outrage from the Jewish people as well as other gr oups. The first translation written by Stella Rodway received a both positive and negative reviews. However, the sales remained unaffected by the attention it did receive. In contrast to Anne Frank's diary, this book was received as a fiction rather than an actual chronological account of what has happened during the holocaust. The book was intensely personal, and some of the events did not quite tally with records of events that has occurred, which makes it an easy for critiques to question the validity of his stories. (Berenbaum, 1979) The book tackled life to death stories as it began with the foreboding doom by Moshe the Beadle, who was an escapee then to the stories of a prophet who was on the train to the camp and was only capable of having visions of fire. Certain analogies pertaining to how eyes filled with pain goes blank and all those eyes would be is two open wounds that are now just an abyss filled with expressions of terror. In one part of the book in particular, a stor y of a little boy who was hung to die with two grown men gripped a lot of readers in the past few decades that the book has been in publication. Again, condemning statements such as of how God, for all the flowery phrases used to describe him, can allow such cruelty and evil come upon his people was perceived as an insult by certain readers. Christianity, as

Why did Radical Republicans Abandoned Women Seeking Rights after the Essay

Why did Radical Republicans Abandoned Women Seeking Rights after the Civil War - Essay Example The purpose of this paper is to explore some of the reasoning and events that took place that drove radical Republicans from acknowledging women's rights and why women in general stopped supporting the Republican Party. As Anna Yeatman (1993) explains it, "the dominant discourses of modern citizenship are predicated on systemic exclusions of those who are othered by these discourses" (quoted in Kingfisher, 1998, p. 128). When "woman" is added to the previously mentioned descriptors, another layer of exclusion is added. For example, the Fifteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, enacted after the Civil War, granted suffrage rights to black men, but excluded women of all races.i The famous line from the Constitution that "All men are created equal" was written completely literally; this line did not include women or slaves as they were considered property. The founding fathers did not think twice when it came to denying the freedoms they had fought for to others, and it has been a long struggle since then to reclaim equal rights for all. Even with constitutional amendments making discrimination based on sex or skin color illegal, it still seems as though the white men in their suits have some sort of advantage over everyone not exactly like them. This undoubtedly is one of the reasons why Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have seemed like such a breath of fresh air in this year's political landscape. Of course, with this year's main democratic candidates being a black man and a white women running for president, it's easy to forget that it was President Lincoln's Republican Party that emancipated the slaves and supported women's rights. So why exactly were the slaves freed in 1865 and women weren't given the right to vote until 1920 The women's rights movement and the abolition movement were conjoined before the Civil War, but afterwards, the Republican Party that had been given so much support by women in the abolition movement promptly dropped their support for equal rights for women. To begin explaining how all of this took place, it is necessary to go back one hundred years before the emancipation of the slaves to obtain a more complete story. The society of 1750's was still highly centered on the farm. Since there was so much work required to be done around a farm, men and women had to invest there full time into the work required. As factories began to become more prominent, many of the traditional jobs delegated to women began to change. These factories took the place of many jobs, such spinning and weaving, and this left women with much more time on their hands. With this extra time, they searched for ways to be more productive. They formed different organizations, some social, and these organizations became the foundations of many women's rights groupsii. The accepted notion of the time was that men and women belonged to different "spheres" of work and socializing, and that it was inappropriate for either men or women to cross the boundaries of these spheres. Men were supposed to work and engage in politics, while women were supposed cook, clean, and take care of the children. It is important to remember that at this time men thought that women should remain submissive. They were thought to have weak constitutions and needed men to take care of them. Throughout the history of the women's rights movement, this attitude was so prevalent that some women even spoke out against being given the right to vote, thinking that it gave too much responsibility. After being told that they were inferior for so long, they apparently began to think that the way they were treated was fair. It took a lot of courage for a woman during this time period